Creatine & Cancer
Dr. Theo Wallimann, Prof. Emeritus, Institute of Cell Biology, ETH Zürich-Hönggerberg, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
Private: Schürmattstrasse 23, CH-8962 Bergdietikon Tel.:
+41-(0)44-740-70-47, Fax: +41-(0)44-741-30-08
E-mail: theo.wallimann@cell.biol.ethz.ch
Internet:http://www.mhs.biol.ethz.ch/about-us/emeriti-formermembers/wallimann.html
The
antitumor
activity of Creatine and Creatine
analogs, such as Phosphocreatine
or
Cyclocreatine, has been recognized since a number
of years.
Numerous studies investigating the
effects of Creatine and Creatine
analogues on a
variety of different cancer cells, either in cell
cultures (in vitro) or implanted into
experimental animals (in
vivo), have been
published by different groups of scientists in
peer-reviewed scientific journals over the last
decades.
Creatine-depletion or
Creatine-replacement with Creatine analogues,
especially beta-guanidino-propionic acid
(beta-GPA) or
Cyclocreatine have consistently
shown significant effects on cancer
cell
proliferation (inhibiton of growth and survival
of different
types of cancer cells, among them
many types of human cancer cells,
either freshly
explanted or establishe cell lines (see numerous
refs. below) and in addition rendered these
cancer cells more
sensitive (by several orders of
magnitude) to chemotherapy and/or
radiation
treatment (see Teicher et al.1995), inhibited
cell cycle
progression (Martin et al. 1994) and
inhibited stimulated motility
(potential for
metastasis) (Mulvaney 1998).
In the some of
these studies, Creatine has either shown similar,
less pronounced
or no anti-cancer cell growth and
proliferation effects, but in none
of the studies
reported has Creatine ever been shown to enhance
cancer cell growth in vitro or in vivo in a
statistically
significant manner. This is strong
evidence that Creatine does not
promote the
growth of cancer cells nor enhance cancer cell
survival
in vivo, Furthermore, there is no
evidence that orally-taken
Creatine would act as
a mutagenic or carcinogenic compound or that
Creatine-supplementation would increase the risk
of cancer, or
generate cancer.
The latter has been
claimed in a recent
report by the French “Agencie Francais
de
Securite Sanitaire des Aliments” report of Jan. 24rd
2001, see
URL: http://www.afssa.fr/actualites/index.asp?mode=actu&ladate=&id_theme=1086&id_info=3022
This
report has been
mistaken world-wide as the
outcome of a French epidemiological study
showing
that creatine would cause cancer, while it turned
out to be
a rather embarrassing, unprofessional
review of the existing
literature on the effects
of creatine in sports and its possible
side
effects.
Creatine and much more so its
decay product,
Creatinine, which is present at
high concentrations in meat to be
consumed are
indeed known to be precursors of carcinogenic
products
that are formed only at high
temperatures (200-250o C), e.g. when
meat is
broiled, grilled or barbequed (for a review see
Wyss M. and
Kaddurah-Daouk R. 2000, Physiol. Rev.
80, 1107-1125). These well
known mostly
creatinine-derived carcinogens seem to be
responsible
for the possible health hazards going
with heavily broiled /
grilledmeat. However, this
latter fact has nothing to do with oral
supplementation of pure creatine powder.
Therefore, these two
situations should not be
related.
The work by Ohira and
Inoue
(1995) (see below), which is heavily cited in the
French
“Agencie Francais de Securite
Sanitaire des Aliments”
report
“concerning the effects and safety of
creatine”
has been mis-interpreted by this
agency as indicating that creatine
would increase
cancer growth, while in fact, the Japanese
researchers (Ohira and Inoue 1995; and Ohira et
al.1991) stress the
point that replacement or
withdrawl, by beta-GPA (a Creatine
analogue), of
cellular creatine in Ehrlich ascites tumor cells
leads to a significantly lower proliferation of
these tumor cells.
The addition of 1% creatine to
the food given to Nude mice that had
been
injected with equal numbers of Ehrlich ascites
tumor cells,
compared to control food without
extra creatine, led to a slight
decrease in tumor
volume, a slight decrease in total cell counts
(both statistically not significant ) (Fig.2),
but to a significant
loss in viability of these
cancer cell in the creatine group (Fig. 3
B) and
to strong anti-cancer effect by beta-GPA (Ohira
et al.
1991). The 1% creatine concentration given
to these animals would
correspond to a daily
intake of approximately 30-50 grams of
Creatine
per day for an adult person. If in the same
animal model
system beta-GPA or creatine were
injected directly into the tumor
volume, beta-GPA
had again a significant inhibitory effect on
cancer growth, whereas Creatine supplementation
"tended to
enhance the growth of these
Ehrlich ascites tumor cells" as
Ohira and
Inoue (1995) state in their abstract. Looking,
however,
at the actual data, the statistical
significance is not convincing
and therefore one
cannot conclude that creatine would enhance
cancer growth. When investigating the effects of
beta-GPA and
creatine on isolated Ehrlich ascites
tumor cells in vitro in cell
cultures, these
authors found that the cells grew much better in
their original ascites fluid environment with no
supplement than in
serum-free medium or in serum
supplemented with
creatine.
An important control, cells grown
in ascites
fluid plus added creatine is missing
in their work. In those
cultures with serum,
Creatine had no effect, but In serum-free
cultures Creatine had a markedly positiv effect
on the growth of
the Ehrlich ascites tumor cells
in vitro, which, however, is not
astonishing
since many other normal, not cancerous cells,
e.g.
muscle cells (Pulido et al. 1998, FEBS
Letters 439, 357-362) or
neuronal cells (Brewer
and Wallimann 2000, J. Neurochemistry
1968-1978)
also grow better in medium containing creatine or
even
get protected against cellular stress by
creatine (see the above
references).
This is one of the reasons why
creatine attracted
so much attention lately as a
possible therapeutic intervention for
neuromusclular (Tarnopolsky and Martin 1999,
Neurology 52, 854-857;
Walter et al. 2000,
Neurology 54, 1848-1850) and neurodegenerative
diseases (Klivenyi et al. 1999, Nature Medicine
5, 347-350) (for
review see Wallimann et al.
1999, in: Guanidino Compunds, Mori et
al. eds.
Blackwell sceince Asia pty ltd. pp 117-129). This
simple,
cheap and safe nutritional supplement has
shown to afford remarkable
neuroprotective
effects in vitro (Wallimann and Brewer, 2000, J.
Neurochemistry 74, 1968-1978; Brustovetsky et al.
2001, J.
Neurochemistry 76, 425-434), in situ
(Carter et al. 1995, J.
Neurochem. 64, 2692-2699;
Wilken et al. 1998, Pediatric Research 43,
8-14)
and in vivo (Holtzman et al. 1998, Pediatric
Research 44,
410-414; Ferrante et al. 2000, J.
Neuroscience 20, 4389-4397; Malcom
et a. 2000,
Brain Research 860, 195-198; Sullivan et al.
2000, Amm.
Neurol. 48, 723-729).
In discordance with the in vivo
results,
addition of creatine to the Ehrlich
ascites cells, cultured in
normal serum, did not
lead to increased viability of these cancer
cells
and neither did beta-GPA show an inhibitory
action anymore on
cell viability, as seen in vivo
(Figs. 4 and 5 of Ohira and Inoue
1995).
Interestingly, the earlier work of the same group
(Ohira et
al. 1991), which contains results that
are contradicting in part the
1995 paper, by
showing no enhancing effects at all of creatine
on
the very same Ehrlich ascites tumor cells in
vivo (Fig 1), was not
cited in the French
report.
Thus again, to conclude from
these
data that creatine enhances cancer growth
is absolutely untenable,
especially in light of
the majority of reports (see below) that
provide
clear evidence for either neutral or even
clear-cut
anti-cancer cell-growth and
cell-viability effects of creatine on a
variety
of freshly explanted cancer cells or on
established cancer
cell lines, a number of both
derived from human
origin.
Provided that the recommended
dosages, which are
entirely within the realm of
nutritional supplementation (except for
the short
loading phase where a somewhat higher dosage is
used) are
not exceeded, creatine is considered as
a safe and valuable
nutritional supplement for
sports, rehabilitation and for persons
who have
to deal with the ever increasing physical and
psychological demands of every days life, as well
as for seniors
and elderly people. This opinion
is shared by US food and
nutritional
organisations, as for example by the Council
for
Responsible Nutrition Washington DC, USA,
which officially
declared the French
creatine-cancer scare unfounded based on the
existing scientific literature. For details,
please, consult the
following home pages: http://www.mmusa.com/creatine-supplement-cancer.php
Some of the most important publications concerning this topic are listed below, some of them with complete and some with shortened abstracts.
G. Ara, L.M. Gravelin, R.
Kaddurah-Daouk, B. A.
Teicher.
Antitumor
Activity of Creatine Analogs Produced by
Alterations in Pancreatic Hormones and Glucose
Metabolism.
In
vivo 1998, 12,
223-232.
Abstract: Animal
study on rats bearing
the 13762 mammary
carcinoma. Intravenously administration of
Creatine analogs Phosphocreatine, Cyclocreatine
or
*-guanidinopropionic acid on days 4 through 8
and 14 through 18 post
tumor implantation leads
to a tumor growth delay up to 15 days. The
antitumor activity of the Creatine analogs
results from three
effects: a) interference with
energy balance in the malignant cells
through the
Creatine kinase system, b) inhibition of the
secretion
of the positive growth factor insulin
from the pancreatic
beta-cells, and c) increased
secretion of the growth inhibitory
factor
somatostatin from the pancreatic
delta-cells.
G.
Bergnes, W. Yuan, V.S. Khandekar, M.M. O'Keefe,
K.J. Martin, B.A. Teicher, R. Kaddurak-Daouk.
Creatine and
Phosphocreatine Analogs: Anticancer Activity and
Enzymatic
Analysis.
Oncology Research 1996,
8, 121-130.
Abstract: in vitro study
on the cytotoxicity to human ME-180
cervical
carcinoma, the MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma and
the
HAT-29 colon adenocarcinoma cell lines at low
mM concentrations.
Creatine was active against
the colon HAT-29 line and slightly
active against
the MCF-7 line. Of the Creatine analogs tested,
cyclocreatine and phosphinic cyclocreatine were
the most potent
cytotoxic agents. Of
Phosphocreatine analogs Phosphocreatine
itself
and phospho-cyclocreatine were most potent
cytotoxic
agents. In vivo evaluation showed a
good correlation to in vitro
results: significant
tumor growth delay for Phosphocreatine,
phosphocyclocreatine, cyclocreatine and phosphinic
cyclocreatine
(comparable to that seen with
standard cancer chemotherapeutic
drugs).
N.M.
Hoosein, Martin KJ,
Abdul M, Logothetis CJ,
Kaddurah-Daouk R.
Antiproliferative effects
of cyclocreatine on human prostatic
carcinoma
cells.
Anticancer Res 1995,
15(4),1339-1342.
Creatine kinase (CK; EC
2.7.3.2)
isoenzymes and their substrates have an
important function in
cellular energy generation
and utilization. The brain isoform
(CK-BB) has
been implicated in cellular transformation
processes involving the oncogenic products the
Ela virus and the
p53 tumor suppressor gene.
Cyclocreatine, an analogue of
creatine, has been
previously shown to inhibit the growth of a
broad
spectrum of cancer cells derived from solid
tumors.
Results reported herein indicate an
increased level of creatine
kinase activity in
human prostate carcinoma cell lines and
inhibitory effects of cyclocreatine alone and in
combination
with adriamycin on the growth of
these cells in vitro and in
vivo, in
immune-deprived mice. Our results suggest the
possible use of cyclocreatine in the treatment of
prostatic
carcinoma.
K.S.
Jeong, S.J. Park,
C.S. Lee, T.W. Kim, S.H. Kim,
S.Y. Ryu, B.H. Williams, R.L.
Veech, Y.S. Lee.
Effects of cyclocreatine
in rat
hepatocarcinogenesis model.
Anticancer. Res. 2000,
20,
1627-33.
Abstract: Cyclocreatine
inhibits the degrees of
GST-P-positive cells and
apoptosis and is active against
hepatocarcinogenesis in rat models. This result
points out the
unique nature of an anticancer
agent that inhibits progression
of chemically
induced hepatocarcinogenesis of rats.
C.A.
Kristensen, N. Askenasy, R.K. Jaln, A.P.
Koretsky.
Creatine and
cyclocreatine treatment of human colon
adenocarcinoma xenografts: 31P and 1H magnetic
resonance
spectroscopic studies.
British Journal
of Cancer 1999, 79,
278-285.
Abstract: Study on the
antitumor effect of
Creatine and Cyclocreatine in
relation to drug accumulation,
energy metabolism,
tumor water accumulation and toxicity.
Intratumoral substrate concentrations induced a
similar decrease
in growth rate in Nude mice
carrying a human colon
adenocarcinoma expressing
CK activity, indicating that both
substrates
(Creatine and Cyclocreatine) were equally potent
in tumor growth inhibition. In vivo, these agents
did not induce
excessive water accumulation and
had no systemic effects on the
mice (weight loss,
hypoglycaemia) that may have caused growth
inhibition.
Note: in this study
Creatine was equally
potent as an anti-cancer
growth agent as Cyclocreatine, albeit
at somewhat
higher concentratons than the latter. It is
conclueded that the anti-proliferative effect of
the above CK
substrates was not related to energy
deficiency, but was
associated with acidosis.
J.W.
Lillie, M.O'Keefe,
H. Valinski, H.A. Hamlin, Jr.,
M.L. Varban, R.
Kaddurah-Daouk.
Cyclocreatine
(1-Carboxymethyl-2-iminoimidazolidine) inhibits
growth ofa broad
spectrum of cancer cells
derived from solid tumors.
Cancer Research 1993, 53,
3172-3178.
Abstract: In an
effort to
investigate the role of creatine kinase and its
substrates in malignancy we have tested the
effect of
cyclocreatine
[1-carboxymethyl-2-iminoimidazolidine (CCr)] on
the growth of tumor cells in vitro and in vivo.
CCr is
phosphorylated by creatine kinase to yield
a synthetic
phosphagen
[(N-phosphorylcyclocreatine (CCr approximately
P)] with thermodynamic and kinetic properties
distinct from
those of creatine phosphate. Weshow
that CCr accumulates as CCr
approximately P in
tumor cells expressing a high level of
creatine
kinase, and that the accumulation of this
phosphagen is detrimental to tumor cell growth.
Tumor cell lines
expressing a low level of
creatine kinase accumulate much less
CCr
approximately P, and consequently are growth
inhibited
only at higher concentrations of CCr.
When these resistant cells
are transfected with a
creatine kinase B expression vector, they
express
creatine kinase, accumulate CCr approximately P,
and are growth inhibited. In vivo, in nude mouse
xenografts, the
rate of growth of a high creatine
kinase expressing tumor cell
line is inhibited in
animals fed 1% CCr. Our results indicate
that CCr
inhibits the growth of tumor cells in vitro and
in
vivo.
N. Maril,
Degani H,
Rushkin E, Sherry AD, Cohn M.
Kinetics of cyclocreatine
and Na(+) cotransport in human breast cancer
cells: mechanism of
activity.
Am J Physiol, 1999, 277(4
Pt 1):C708-C716
Abstract The
growth-inhibitory effect of cyclocreatine (CCr)
and the kinetics of CCr and Na(+) cotransport
were investigated
in MCF7 human breast cancer
cells and its adriamycin-resistant
subline with
use of (31)P- and (23)Na-NMR spectroscopy. The
growth-inhibitory effect in the resistant line
occurred at a
lower CCr concentration and was
more pronounced than in the
wild-type line. This
correlated with an approximately 10-fold
higher
affinity of CCr to the transporter in the
resistant
line. The passive diffusion coefficient
of CCr was also higher
in the resistant line by
three- to fourfold. The transport of
CCr was
accompanied by a rapid increase in intracellular
Na(+). This increase was found to depend on the
rate of CCr
transport and varied differently with
CCr concentration in the
two cell lines. It is
proposed that the cotransport of CCr and
Na(+)
followed by increased Na(+) concentration,
together
with the accumulation of the highly
charged
phosphocyclocreatine, are responsible for
cell swelling and
death.
Note: This paper shows
that creatine also had a
clear effect on cancer
cell swelling and killing those cells,
albeit
much lower than that obtained with
cyclocreatine.
K.J.
Martin, E.R.
Winslow, M. O?Keefe, V.S Khandekar,
A. Hamlin, J.W. Lillie,
Kaddurah-Daouk, R.
Specific targeting of
tumor cells by
the creatine analog
cyclocreatine.
International Journal
of
Oncology1996, 9, 993-999.
Abstractd: Cyclocreatine
(CCr), a CK substrate analog was shown to be
cytotoxic to a
broad spectrum of solid tumors. We
have measured and compared
the CK activity and
CCr sensitivity of 49 transformed and
non-transformed cell lines. Tumor cell lines
highest in CK and
most sensitive to CCr were
derived from prostate, small cell
lung and
neuronal tissue. The hematopoetic tumor lines
tested were generally low in CK and all were
resistant to CCr.
Fourteen non-transformed cell
lines were examined and all were
resistant to the
compound including six with high levels of CK.
Thus, CCr preferentially targeted tumor cells.
Further, CCr
inhibited tumor cell proliferation
more efficiently than
macromolecular synthesis
indicating that, rather than exerting a
general
effect on energy metabolism, CCr may act on a
specific pathway involved in controlling tumor
cell
proliferation.
Note: this paper holds
arguments against
the notion that if antagonists
of creatine would inhibit cancer
growth then
creatine should do the contrary by promoting
it.
K.J.
Martin, S.-F. Chen,
G.M. Clark, D. Degen, M.
Wajima, D.D. von Hoff, R.
Kaddurah-Daouk.
Evaluation of Creatine
Analogues as a
New Class of Anticancer Agents
Using Freshly Explanted Human
Tumor Cells.
Journal of the National
Cancer Institute
1994, 86, 608-613.
Abstract: The Creatine
analogues,
cyclocreatine and homocyclocreatine,
effectively reduced colony
formation of freshly
explanted human tumor cells. The mechanism
of
action from those compounds seems to differ from
those
of standard chemotherapeutics.
K.J.
Martin, E.R.
Winslow, R. Kaddurah-Daouk.
Cell Cycle Studies of
Cyclocreatine, a New Anticancer Agent.
Cancer Research 1994,
54,
5160-5165.
Abstract: Investigation
of the
effects of Cyclocreatine on proliferation,
viability, and cell
progression. Cyclocreatine
demonstrated components of both
cytostatic and
cyctotoxic activity and caused general block of
progression out of all phases of the cell
cycle.
E.E.
Miller, A.E. Evans, M. Cohn.
Inhibition of rate of
tumor
growth by Creatine and Cyclocreatine.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 1993, 90, 3304-3308.
Abstract: Growth rate
inhibition of subcutaneously implanted tumors
results from
feeding rats and athymic nude mice
diets containing 1%
cyclocreatine or 1%, 2%, 5%,
or 10% creatine. The tumors studied
included rat
mammary tumors (Ac33tc in Lewis female rats and
13762A in Fischer 344 female rats), rat sarcoma
MCI in Lewis
male rats, and tumors resulting from
the injection of two human
neuroblastoma cell
lines, IMR-5 and CHP-134, in athymic nude
mice.
Inhibition was observed regardless of the time
experimental diets were administered, either at
the time of
tumor implantation or after the
appearance of palpable tumors.
For mammary tumor
Ac33tc, the growth inhibition during 24 days
after the implantation was approximately 50% for
both 1%
cyclocreatine and 1% creatine, and
inhibition increased as
creatine was increased
from 2% to 10% of the diet. For the other
rat
mammary tumor (13762A), there was approximately
35%
inhibition by both 1% cyclocreatine and 2%
creatine. In the case
of the MCI sarcoma, the
inhibitory effect appeared more
pronounced at
earlier periods of growth, ranging from 26% to
41% for 1% cyclocreatine and from 30% to 53% for
1% creatine;
there was no significant difference
in growth rate between the
tumors in the rats fed
1% and 5% creatine. The growth rate of
tumors in
athymic nude mice, produced by implantation of
the human neuroblastoma IMR-5 cell line, appeared
somewhat more
effectively inhibited by 1%
cyclocreatine than by 1% creatine,
and 5%
creatine feeding was most effective. For the
CHP-134
cell line, 33% inhibition was observed
for the 1% cyclocreatine
diet and 71% for the 5%
creatine diet. In several experiments, a
delay in
appearance of tumors was observed in animals on
the experimental diets. In occasional
experiments, neither
additive inhibited tumor
growth rate for the rat tumors or the
athymic
mouse tumors.
Note: In all these
tumors,
mammary tumors, rat sarcoma and
neuroblastoma dietary creatine
alone had a
remarkabe inhibitory effect on cancer growth in
vivo.
P.T.
Mulvaney, M.L
Stracke., S.W.Nam, E. Woodhouse, M.
O?Keefe, T.Clair, L.A.
Liotta, R. Kaddurah-
Daouk, E. Schiffmann.
Cyclocreatine
inhibits
stimulated motility in tumor cells possessing
creatine kinase.
Int. J. Cancer 1998, 78,
46-52.
Abstract: Cyclocreatine
(CCr) inhibits the stimulated motility o
tumor
cells wich posses creatine kinase. Human melanoma
cells, transfected with a creatine kinase gene,
showed an 80-90%
reduction in chemotactic
response to type iV collagen when
incubated
overnight in the presence of 10mM CCr. This
inhibitory effect of CCr can only be partially
reversed by
addition of creatine. Further
experiments utilizing type IV
collagen as
attractant demonstrated that CCr in hibited the
chemokinetic and the haptotactic responses and
the in vitro
invasion of these melanoma cells
through Matrigel coated
membranes. In addition,
motility stimulation of these cells bei
either
autotaxin or fibronectin was markedly inhibited
by
CCr. DU-145 prostatic tumor cells, expressing
endogenous CK,
also have a reduced motility
response to either autotaxin or
epidermal growth
factor-induced motility in the presence of CCr
indicating that this compound can also lower the
metastatic
potential of cancer cells.
Y.Ohira ,
and Inoue
N.
Effects of creatine and
beta-guanidinopropionic acid
on the growth of
Ehrlich ascites tumor cells: i.p. injection and
culture study.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1995,
1243(3):367-372
Abstract Growth of
Ehrlich ascites tumor
(EAT) cells in the
abdominal space of mice or in cell culture
was
studied in response to i.p. injection or
addition,
respectively, of creatine or creatine
analogue
beta-guanidinopropionic acid (beta-GPA).
The increase in body
weight of the mice due to
cancer growth was less in the
beta-GPA-injected
than in the creatine- or sham-injected group.
The
volume of abdominal ascites and total cell counts
at
11th day after implantation of EAT cells was
significantly less
in the beta-GPA than in the
other groups. The proliferation rate
of EAT cells
in the beta-GPA group was 27% and 35% of the
creatine- and sham-injected groups, respectively.
Supplementation of creatine tended to enhance the
growth of EAT
cells. The creatine concentration
in ascites fluid was
approximately 4-times
greater than in blood plasma of
sham-injected
control mice. But the creatine content in EAT
cells was significantly reduced to approximately
50% in response
to beta-GPA injection. Cell
culture without creatine caused a
significant
decrease in viability. The viability was
improved, however, by addition of either creatine
or serum into
the medium. By contrast, it was not
significantly increased by
addition of serum
alone which caused only a minor elevation of
the
creatine level (23 microM). It is suggested that
EAT
cell growth isinhibited by lowering the
availability of creatine
in association with some
unknown factors in serum or ascites
fluid.
Y.Ohira ,
Ishine S,
Inoue N, Yunoki K.
Reduced growth of Ehrlich
ascites
tumor cells in creatine depleted mice fed
beta-guanidinopropionic acid.
Biochim Biophys Acta
1991,1097(2),117-122.
Abstract: The effect of
implantation of Ehrlich ascites tumor (EAT) cells
on creatine
distribution was investigated. It was
also studied how depletion
of creatine by feeding
creatine-analogue beta-guanidinopropionic
acid
(beta-GPA) affects the growth of EAT cells in
mice.
Enhanced mobilization of creatine from host
tissues to EAT cells
against a greater
concentration gradient was observed. The
creatine
(but not creatinine) level in blood plasma was
lowered to 22% of the normal value by beta-GPA
feeding alone and
assimilation of 14C-creatine
into EAT cells was inhibited. The
growth of EAT
cells was significantly reduced and the duration
of survival of mice after implantation of EAT
cells was extended
when the creatine
concentration was decreased. A decrease in
daily
food consumption and the degree of muscle atrophy
after implantation of EAT cells was less in
beta-GPA than
control groups. In the
creatine-depleted mice, the rate of
increase in
total EAT cell number and the volume of abdominal
ascites were approximately half of the control
values, and more
dead EAT cells were observed.
These results suggest that
supplementation of
beta-GPA inhibits creatine transfer to EAT
cells
and reduces the growth of cancer cells.
Schiffenbauer YS, Tempel C, Abramovitch
R, Meir G,
Neeman M.
Cyclocreatine
accumulation leads to cellular
swelling in C6
glioma multicellular spheroids: diffusion and
one-dimensional chemical shift nuclear magnetic
resonance
microscopy.
Cancer Res 1995,
55(1):153-158.
Abstract: Cyclocreatine,
an analogue of creatine, inhibits tumor
cell
proliferation in vitro and in vivo. The effects
of
cyclocreatine in large C6 glioma multicellular
spheroids were
mapped here by magnetic resonance
microscopy. Diffusion-weighted
images of C6
glioma spheroids resolved the bright viable rim
and the dark necrotic center. Sequential sets of
diffusion
images, following cyclocreatine
administration, showed
increasing self-diffusion
coefficients of the intracellular
water in the
viable rim (0.49 x 10(-5) cm2/s for untreated
spheroids, 0.62 x 10(-5) cm2/s after 48 h
perfusion with 20 mM
cyclocreatine). This fact
correlated with cellular swelling
apparent in
histological sections. The radial distribution of
cyclocreatine and soluble lipids across perfused
C6 spheroids
was measured by one-dimensional
chemical shift imaging.
Cyclocreatine
accumulation was prominent throughout the viable
cell layer, with no cyclocreatine accumulation in
the necrotic
center. In both
cyclocreatine-treated and control spheroids the
lipid signal was highest in the necrotic center
and lower
in the inner viable cell layer.
Schiffenbauer YS, Meir G,
Cohn M, Neeman
M.
Cyclocreatine transport and cytotoxicity in
rat glioma and human ovarian carcinoma cells:
31P-NMR
spectroscopy.
Am J Physiol 1996
Jan;270(1 Pt
1):C160-9
Abstract: Cyclocreatine
(CY), an analogue of
creatine, inhibits tumor
growth in vivo and proliferation of
tumor cells
in vitro. The goal of this study was to probe the
mechanism of CY transport and cytotoxicity in C6
rat glioma
cells and OC238 human ovarian
carcinoma cells (creatine kinase
activities of
0.16 and 0.016 units/mg protein, respectively).
In both cell lines, CY significantly inhibited
cell growth with
no effect on membrane integrity
and on the content of nucleoside
triphosphates.
An intrinsic 31P-nuclear magnetic resonance
(31P-NMR) signal of phosphocreatine, as well as
accumulation of
phosphocyclocreatine (PCY) after
addition of CY, was observed
for C6 glioma but
not for the OC238 cells. Transport of CY in C6
glioma showed Michaelis-Menten kinetics for an
active
sodium-dependent component. Transport was
reduced more than
fivefold in low-glucose medium.
The toxicity of CY to C6 glioma
cells may be due
to PCY accumulation and cellular swelling.
Another mechanism must be invoked to explain CY
effects on the
human ovarian cancer cells in
which no PCY accumulation could be
detected and
no cellular swellin was observed.
L.
Schimmel, V.S. Khandekar, K.J. Martin, T. Riera,
C. Honan, D.G.
Shaw, R. Kaddurah-Daouk.
The
Synthetic Phosphagen
Cyclocreatine Phosphate
Inhibits the Growth of a Broad Spectrum
of Solid
Tumors.
Anticancer Research 1996,
16,
375-380.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The
brain isoform of
creatine kinase (CKBB), an
enzyme involved in energy metabolism,
has been
implicated in cellular transformation process.
Cyclocreatine (CCr), a creatine kinase (CK)
substrate analogue,
was shown to inhibit the
growth of a broad spectrum of solid
tumors
expressing high levels of CK. Cyclocreatine
phosphate (CCrP) generated by CK, was proposed to
be the active
form responsible for growth
inhibition. MATERIALS AND METHODS:
We synthesized
CCrP and tested its cellular uptake and anti
tumor activity in stem cell assays and in athymic
mouse models.
RESULTS: CCrP seems to be taken up
by cells and inhibitsthe
growth of solid tumors
with high levels of CK. CCr and CCrP have
similar
specificity and potency. CONCLUSION: The
observation that only high-CK cell lines were
responsive to
CCrP, similar to CCr, indicates
that the enzyme requirement was
not bypassed. We
propose that CK is a target for CCrP, and is
involved in mediating its antiproliferative
activity.
B.A.
Teicher, K. Menon, D. Northey, J. Liu, D.W. Kufe,
R. Kaddurah-Daouk.
Cyclocreatine in cancer
chemotherapy.
Cancer Chemother.
Pharmacol. 1995, 35,
411-416.
Abstract: Cyclocreatine,
an analog of creatine,
is an efficient substrate
for creatine kinase, but its
phosphorylated form
is a poor phosphate donor in comparison with
creatine phosphate. Cyclocreatine was not very
cytotoxic
upon 24 h of exposure of human SW2
small-cell lung cancer cells
to concentrations of
up to 5 mM. However, combinations of
cyclocreatine (0.5 mM, 24 h) with each of four
antitumor
alkylating agents,
cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II), melphalan,
4-hydroperoxy-cyclo-phosphamide, and carmustine,
resulted
in additive to greater-than-additive
cytotoxicity toward
exponentially growing SW2
cells. The greatest levels of synergy
were seen
at higher concentrations of
4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide and carmustine as
determined by
isobologram analysis. In vivo
cyclocreatine (0.5 or 1 g/kg) was
more effective
if given i.v. rather than i.p. The longest
tumor-growth delays, up to 10 days, were produced
by extended
regimens of cyclocreatine.
Cyclocreatine was an effective
addition to
therapy with standard anticancer agents including
cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II),
cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin,
or 5-fluorouracil.
No additional toxicity was observed when 10
days
of cyclocreatine treatment was given with full
standard-dose regimens of each drug. The
resultant increases in
tumor-growth delay were
1.7- to 2.4-fold as compared with those
obtained
for each of the drugs alone. These results
indicate that cyclocreatine may be an effective
single agent and
an effective addition to
combination chemotherapy regimens.
Kornacker
M, Schlattner U, Wallimann T, Verneris MR,
Negrin
RS, Kornacker B, Staratschek-Jox A, Diehl V, Wolf
J.
Hodgkin disease-derived cell lines expressing
ubiquitous
mitochondrial creatine kinase show
growth inhibition by
cyclocreatine treatment
independent of apoptosis.
Int. J.
Cancer 2001
Nov15;94(4):513-519
Abstract: Ubiquitous
mitochondrial creatine kinase (uMtCK), a key
enzyme in energy
metabolism, was identified by
differential display PCR to be
specifically
overexpressed in L1236, the first cell line of
definite Hodgkin origin. RT-PCR confirmed
overexpression of
uMtCK in the L1236 cell line
and the absence of cytosolic B-CK,
which is
co-expressed with MtCK physiologically.
Cyclocreatine (cCr), whose phosphorylated form is
a very poor
substrate for CK, inhibited
proliferation of the L1236 cell line
nearly
entirely. This inhibition by cCr was partially
reversed by competition with creatine, which by
itself, however,
had no effect, whatsoweve, on
proliferation of the L1236 cell
line. Although
these results support a role of CK activity in
the inhibitory action of cCr, it remains open
whether the cCr
effect is due to its inhibition
of CK-linked energy metabolism
or if alternative
mechanisms have to be considered. Because the
anti-proliferative effect of cCr was not due to
induction
of apoptosis, in contrast to most other
anticancer agents,
treatment with the creatine
analogue cCr may represent an
advantageous
therapeutic approach for cells resistant to
programmed cell death.
NOTOX Safety &
Environmental Research B.V., Hambakenwetering 3, P.O. Box 3476, 5203
DL 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Evaluation of the mutagenic
activity of Creapure * (Creatine Monohydrate,
AlzChem-Degussa-Trostberg AG, Germany) in the salmonella typhimurium
reverse mutation assay with independent repeat (Ames test),
1997.
Abstract: Evaluation of
Creatine Monohydrate for
its ability to induce
reverse mutations in a gene of
histidine-requiring Salmonella typhimurium
bacterial strains
according to the OECD
principles of Good Laboratory Practice.
Creatine
Monohydrate did not induce a dose-related
increase
in the number of relevant colonies.
Creatine Monohydrate is not
mutagenic in the
Salmonella typhimurium mutation
assay.